Editorial Policy

The editorial team at AiTrading.cash operates with full independence from any commercial partnerships, sponsorship arrangements, or advertising agreements. No platform, broker, or third party has the ability to influence our review scores, editorial conclusions, or the placement of content on this website.

Every review follows the same structured evaluation methodology — assessing regulation, fees, usability, support, risk management, and AI technology — ensuring consistent standards regardless of whether a commercial relationship exists with the platform being reviewed. Our analysts are compensated for the quality and accuracy of their work, never for producing favourable outcomes.

We may earn commissions through affiliate links when users visit partner platforms via our website. This is how we fund our independent research, pay our analysts, and keep all of our content freely accessible. We believe in being completely transparent about this.

When a link on our site is an affiliate link, the content around it has been produced under the same editorial standards as every other piece of content. We will never recommend a platform solely because of an affiliate relationship.

All reviews published on AiTrading.cash adhere to a consistent set of editorial standards designed to protect reader trust and ensure the usefulness of our content.

• ✦Structured methodology: Every review follows our six-criteria evaluation framework with clearly defined weightings.
• ✦Merit-based assessment: Platforms are assessed on their actual features, fees, and regulatory standing — not on advertising spend or partnership status.
• ✦Honest reporting: Negative findings are reported without omission. We do not soften criticism to maintain commercial relationships.
• ✦Clear language: Content is written in professional, accessible language without promotional exaggeration or hype.
• ✦Risk disclosure: All content includes appropriate risk warnings and disclaimers, prominently placed.
• ✦Dated content: Every review displays the date of last update so readers can assess timeliness.

We are committed to accuracy, but we recognise that platforms evolve and errors can occur. When we identify or are notified of factual inaccuracies, we act promptly and transparently.

• Minor factual corrections (e.g., updated fee amounts, new support channels) are applied directly, and the "last updated" date is refreshed.
• Material corrections that affect a platform's score or editorial conclusion are accompanied by a visible correction note explaining what changed and why.
• We welcome feedback from platforms, readers, and industry professionals. If you believe any information on our site is inaccurate or outdated, we encourage you to contact us.
• We will never remove legitimate criticism at the request of a platform or commercial partner.

We value transparency and open communication. If you have questions about our editorial process, wish to report an inaccuracy, or want to provide feedback on any of our content, we encourage you to reach out.

You can contact our editorial team through our contact page. We aim to respond to all editorial enquiries within two working days.